Technical Guide

    TDAE T400 vs RPO 220: Which Rubber Process Oil Does Your Compound Actually Need?

    Two REACH-compliant process oils in a similar price band — but aromaticity, viscosity at 100 °C, pour point and packing separate them. A parameter-by-parameter comparison as a compounder would read it.

    Author: Owen Leong, Founder, Sanyang Petroleum8 min readAsiaTDAE · Rubber Process Oil · Process Oil · Technical Guide · Malaysia

    Two REACH-compliant process oils, similar price band, both used as extenders for synthetic rubber. It would be easy to treat them as interchangeable and buy on price.

    They are not interchangeable, and the parameters that separate them are not the obvious ones. Here is the comparison as a compounder would read it.

    Side by side

    Parameter comparison of SANYANG TDAE T400 and SANYANG RPO 220
    ParameterSANYANG TDAE T400SANYANG RPO 220Test method
    Aniline point, °C64–75max 95ASTM D611
    Aromatic ring carbon (Ca), %min 25min 20ASTM D2140
    Kinematic viscosity at 100 °C, mm²/s16–2320–30ASTM D445
    Kinematic viscosity at 40 °C, mm²/s300–600ASTM D445
    Viscosity Gravity Constant0.863–0.915ASTM D2501
    Glass transition temperature, °C−55 to −45ASTM E1356
    Pour point, °C, max3015ASTM D97
    Flash point COC, °C, min220210ASTM D92
    Total sulfur, %, max4.03.0ASTM D4294
    Density at 20 °C, kg/m³927–967920–960ASTM D4052
    Benzo[a]pyrene, mg/kg, max11EN 16143
    Sum of PAHs, mg/kg, max1010EN 16143
    Packing includes ISO tankYesNo

    Four things in that table matter more than the rest.

    1. Aromaticity — the real dividing line

    Aniline point is an inverse measure of aromaticity: the lower it runs, the more aromatic the oil. T400 sits at 64–75 °C. RPO 220 is specified only as a maximum of 95 °C, which puts it in a meaningfully less aromatic band. The Ca figures point the same way — minimum 25% against minimum 20%.

    This is the difference that determines where each oil belongs. Higher aromaticity means stronger solvency for carbon black and silica, better compatibility with SBR and BR, and — critically for tread compounds — a larger contribution to wet grip. Our guide on how process oil moves wet grip and rolling resistance covers the mechanism in detail.

    For a tread compound sold on wet performance, that gap is not a rounding difference. For a conveyor belt cover or a moulded industrial article, it may be irrelevant.

    2. RPO 220 is heavier at 100 °C, not lighter

    This one surprises people who assume the cheaper oil is the thinner one. At 100 °C, RPO 220 runs 20–30 mm²/s against T400's 16–23. RPO 220 is the more viscous product at operating temperature.

    It matters for mixing behaviour and for how the oil disperses in a highly filled compound. Do not assume a like-for-like viscosity substitution when moving between them.

    3. Pour point runs the opposite way to expectations

    T400 has a pour point up to 30 °C. RPO 220 is capped at 15 °C.

    So the more aromatic, technically higher-grade oil is the harder one to handle. T400 is semi-solid at ordinary ambient temperatures across most of Asia and will need heated discharge in nearly every destination. RPO 220 is more forgiving — still semi-solid in cooler conditions, but with a 15 °C margin that makes tropical-port handling considerably simpler.

    There is a packing consequence too: T400 is available in ISO tanks, RPO 220 is not. For a buyer without heated receiving facilities, that combination — lower pour point, but no ISO tank option — needs thinking through before the order rather than at discharge. Our shipping and heating guide covers the planning.

    4. What RPO 220 does not specify

    RPO 220's data sheet carries no glass transition temperature and no viscosity gravity constant. That is not a defect; it reflects what the grade is sold for.

    But it has a practical consequence. If your formulation is designed around a target compound Tg — which is standard practice in tread development — you cannot model RPO 220's effect without generating that data yourself. T400 gives you −55 to −45 °C to work with. For tread work, that alone may decide the question.

    Choosing between them

    Use SANYANG TDAE T400 where: the compound is a tyre tread or sidewall; wet grip is a performance claim; the polymer system is SBR or BR and needs strong solvency; filler loading is high; or the formulation is specified around a target Tg.

    Use SANYANG RPO 220 where: the application is general rubber goods, conveyor belts, hoses, profiles or moulded articles; full aromaticity is not required; cost per tonne is a primary driver; or handling constraints favour the lower pour point.

    Do not substitute one for the other in an existing formulation without reformulation work. The aromaticity gap will change cure behaviour, filler dispersion and hardness. The adjustment is usually manageable, but it is a formulation project, not a purchase order change.

    What both share

    Both are Malaysian origin, supplied ex-Pasir Gudang. Both carry benzo[a]pyrene below 1 mg/kg and sum of PAHs below 10 mg/kg, measured to EN 16143, and both comply with REACH including Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/326. Both come with batch-specific certificates of analysis, and both have a 24-month shelf life.

    For a manufacturer exporting finished goods to Europe, that compliance parity is the point: the choice between them is a technical and commercial decision, not a regulatory one.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between TDAE and RPO?

    The main difference is aromaticity. TDAE is more aromatic — SANYANG TDAE T400 has an aniline point of 64–75 °C and Ca minimum 25%, against RPO 220's maximum 95 °C and Ca minimum 20%. Higher aromaticity gives stronger filler solvency and a larger wet grip contribution in tread compounds.

    Is RPO a cheaper substitute for TDAE?

    RPO 220 sits at a lower price point, but it is a different oil rather than a discounted version of the same one. It suits general rubber goods where full aromaticity is not required. Substituting it into a formulation designed around TDAE requires reformulation work.

    Which process oil has the lower pour point?

    RPO 220, at a maximum of 15 °C, against TDAE T400 at a maximum of 30 °C. The more aromatic grade is the harder one to handle, which runs counter to what most buyers expect.

    Which is more viscous, TDAE T400 or RPO 220?

    At 100 °C, RPO 220 is more viscous — 20–30 mm²/s against T400's 16–23 mm²/s. This affects mixing behaviour and should not be assumed away when comparing the two.

    Do both oils meet REACH requirements?

    Yes. Both carry benzo[a]pyrene below 1 mg/kg and the sum of listed PAHs below 10 mg/kg, measured to EN 16143, and comply with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 including Commission Regulation (EU) No 2015/326.

    Can I use RPO 220 in a tyre tread compound?

    It is possible for some tread applications, but its lower aromaticity gives a weaker wet grip contribution, and its data sheet does not specify a glass transition temperature — which makes it harder to model in a formulation designed around a target compound Tg. TDAE T400 is the better fit for performance tread work.

    Can both be shipped in ISO tanks?

    TDAE T400 can. RPO 220's standard packing options are road tanks, railway tanks, rail-containers and IBC containers — ISO tank is not among them. Confirm packing at enquiry stage rather than assuming parity.

    Sanyang Petroleum supplies SANYANG TDAE T400 and SANYANG RPO 220 from Malaysia to tyre manufacturers, retreaders and rubber goods producers across Southeast Asia, South Asia and the Middle East, with batch-specific COAs and EN 16143 PAH analysis as standard. Contact info@sanyangpetroleum.com or submit an RFQ.

    Trading Desk

    Comparing process oils for a specific compound?

    Sanyang Petroleum supplies REACH-compliant TDAE and rubber process oils of Malaysian origin with batch-specific certificates of analysis and EN 16143 PAH analysis. Request full specifications and current availability from our trading desk.

    Further Reading